← All resources

Current Security and AI in Research Administration

research security, research administration, compliance, era software

By integrating AI in research administration, institutions can handle seemingly complex compliance rules, even as they maintain a system of record that can be audited effectively. Remarkably, the federal government has in the recent past implemented stringent research security mandates, which are designed to mitigate foreign influence while curbing intellectual property theft. Notable examples include NSPM-33, the CHIPS and Science Act, and CMMC. Robust eRA systems like Streamlyne provide a solution that allows institutions to achieve such adherence seamlessly. You can learn more about the product and safeguards through Streamlyne Security.

Research Security in Grant Management Today

As a concept, research security refers to the efforts that the federal government has taken to protect the integrity of research in the US. Even as institutions conduct research, they need to do it in a way that would minimize the risk of being influenced by foreign entities while ensuring that data and other forms of relevant intellectual property are secure. Research offices are now expected to go beyond simply filling out standard grant applications, particularly by exercising proper oversight over every scientist, lab worker, and international partner connected to federal funding.

What Are the Latest Federal Rules for Institutions?

  • NSPM-33 & CHIPS Act Programs: Universities receiving over $50 million in annual federal research funds are now required to implement a formal Research Security Program, which should address issues related to cybersecurity, foreign travel, and insider threats.
  • Mandatory Security Training: Per the current regulations, senior personnel on grants are expected to complete certified security training, specifically on matters involving export controls and foreign interference.
  • Common Disclosure Forms: This requirement applies to organizations such as NIH and NSF that provide funding, as they are required to use standardized SciENcv forms for Biographical Sketches and Current & Pending Support. Accordingly, researchers should list all foreign and domestic jobs, as well as consulting gigs, gifts, and lab space.
  • Malign Foreign Talent Bans: Under the new rules, researchers are expected to refrain from joining foreign government talent programs, particularly those that would require them to share secret research or hand over patent rights.
  • Section 117 Foreign Reporting: The current regulations also mandate institutions to report all foreign gifts, contracts, and foreign funding sources that amount to $250,000 or more per year to the US Department of Education.
  • CMMC Cybersecurity: DOD awards that involve controlled unclassified information are required to comply with strict cybersecurity standards (NIST SP 800-171), minimizing the risk of old research loopholes.

How Does AI in Research Administration Help in Conflicts of Interest?

Some of the main issues that federal auditors prioritize include financial conflicts of interest and foreign disclosures, in line with the latest regulations. Even though tracking the financial ties across hundreds of faculty members is an option, it has significant drawbacks, such as the risk of missing red flags and having delayed submissions. By using AI in research administration, institutions can organize each researcher’s outside relationships including ownership shares and consulting payments. This information is then provided in one central profile via products like Streamlyne Conflict of Interest. The system automatically triggers disclosure reviews annually, as well as any time a researcher is featured on a new proposal or award. Equally important, the software logs the reviewer’s decision, alongside sending overdue alerts and generating clear reports for pertinent stakeholders.

How Can Research Offices Track Export Control Activities?

Federal regulations are also intended to protect sensitive data and equipment used in research, particularly from users without the proper authorization. However, compliance software does not make regulatory determinations and neither does it check restricted-party lists directly. Institutions can instead use the eRA software to create traceable activity reports for common export tasks such as general screening and international travel approvals. As a tool, Streamlyne Export Control allows universities to manage these workflows efficiently and if research contracts raise any related issues, the records attach directly and precisely to the agreement file. Furthermore, the AI assistant, Lyn, can, via Streamlyne Negotiations, scan incoming texts against the organization’s written policies, highlighting risky clauses and providing citations so legal teams can finalize negotiations faster.

How Training Records and Foreign Travel Can Be Tracked

Proving to federal auditors that your institution has met all the relevant grant conditions is a meticulous process, specifically one that requires recordkeeping across all the departments. Notably, the system software tracks training completion and expiration dates, comparing the information against a customizable course catalog. The tool also monitors mandatory research security courses for staff, along with traditional IRB and IACUC certifications. Regarding international travel compliance under NSPM-33, the system records approvals for traveling to other countries, particularly in scenarios that are connected directly to specific active awards. This information includes the traveler’s name, as well as other essential details such as their destination and travel dates. Users can then access this data easily even before the researcher travels.

How Systems Generate Support Reports and Action Logs

Although the option of compiling current and pending support data from separate departmental spreadsheets is doable, it increases the risk of human error and non-compliance. Accordingly, your institution could rely on a platform that can pull verified proposal and award data directly from the system database, generating standardized reports instantly. The software also records all the pertinent information for each routed file, including edits and submissions, while ensuring that only personnel with the requisite authorization can view sensitive financial disclosures.

Guidance Resources for Compliance

You can stay updated about the current federal regulations and other relevant guidelines by learning more from these resources:

Frequently Asked Questions

Does eRA software check faculty against federal restriction lists automatically?

No. Software like Streamlyne does not check anyone against government lists. Instead, the tool provides an official system of record that export officers and compliance staff could use to log pertinent information, including their manual reviews and attachments.

How does AI help in redlining contracts without replacing human lawyers?

Streamlyne’s AI assistant, Lyn, does not determine compliance for you. Rather, the technology scans contract text and compares it with your institution’s legal policies, highlighting violations with the exact citations. A human administrator or legal officer must then approve or review the changes.

Why is it necessary for faculty to disclose project-level conflicts of interest if they already submit annual disclosures?

Even though annual disclosures can offer a general baseline of outside financial ties, they are not sufficient to ensure proper compliance with current regulations. Accordingly, institutions could use project-specific disclosures to verify that each grant proposal or research protocol does not create a COI in the first place.

Author bio: Bramwel Saisi is an author and researcher specializing in federal grant compliance, institutional policy, and sponsored project operations.

Want this handled by software?

Request a demo

Or read more from the blog →