In short
The AISES AI Scholarship Policy (on the AISES Scholarships page) allows AI for brainstorming, outlining, editing, revision and proofreading. Applicants must write all responses themselves, in their own voice, and use their own thoughts for idea generation and response writing. The pages give no AI rule for reviewers and no disclosure requirement.
Limits AI. Applicants may use AI for some tasks, and the funder restricts how much of an application AI may write.
For applicants
- Final responses must be the applicant's own work. Applicants should use their own thoughts for idea generation and response writing. [1]
- AISES does not prohibit AI for revision and proofreading. The policy also says AI tools can help brainstorm ideas, outline, or edit. [1]
- AISES expects the applicant to personally write all responses submitted in the application. Responses should be in the applicant's authentic voice. [1]
For reviewers
AISES (Advancing Indigenous Science and Engineering Society) has published no rules for reviewers.
Sources
AISES Scholarships (opens in a new tab)
While we believe that artificial intelligence (AI) tools help brainstorm ideas, outline, or edit, the final responses must be the applicant’s own work.
While the AISES Scholarship Team does not prohibit the use of AI technologies for the purpose of revision and proofreading, applicants should use their own thoughts for idea generation and response writing.
We expect that an applicant will personally write all responses submitted for review in the application.
You will tell your own story better than AI can.
See AISES (Advancing Indigenous Science and Engineering Society)'s 1 open program
This page summarizes what the funder has published and is not legal advice. Policies change, and one solicitation can add its own rules. Confirm against the funding announcement before you apply.