In short
The only AI guidance is a 2026 EMBL Career Development blog post summarizing a fellowship Q&A panel. It says AI tools may be used to improve readability, structure and clarity, but applicants stay fully responsible for the scientific content. It states no disclosure rule and gives no guidance for reviewers. The post is advice from panelists, not a formal funder policy.
Permits AI. Applicants may use AI and stay responsible for what they submit.
For applicants
- AI tools may help improve readability, structure and clarity. Use AI as a tool, not as a substitute for scientific thinking. [1]
- Applicants stay fully responsible for the scientific content and must be able to defend every aspect of the proposal. [1]
- Rule of thumb from the panel: if you cannot confidently explain an idea in an interview, it should not appear in the application. [1]
- Originality, critical thinking and ownership of ideas remain essential, however the proposal is drafted. The page states no disclosure requirement. [1]
For reviewers
European Molecular Biology Laboratory has published no rules for reviewers.
Sources
Before you submit your fellowship application: Five things to know (opens in a new tab)
Use it as a tool, not as a substitute for scientific thinking.
The panel acknowledged that AI tools can help improve readability, structure, and clarity.
However, applicants should remain fully responsible for the scientific content and be able to defend every aspect of the proposal.
A useful rule of thumb emerged from the discussion: if you cannot confidently explain an idea during an interview, it probably should not appear in your application.
Originality, critical thinking, and ownership of ideas remain essential, regardless of how the proposal is drafted.
See European Molecular Biology Laboratory's programs
This page summarizes what the funder has published and is not legal advice. Policies change, and one solicitation can add its own rules. Confirm against the funding announcement before you apply.