In short
The Great Lakes Fishery Commission has stated its position on AI in peer review of research proposals. Reviewers cannot and should not use AI, large language models, or other generative AI technologies. The commission says this would breach confidentiality. The commission has published no guidance for applicants.
Reviewer rules only. The funder has rules for reviewers and has published none for applicants.
For applicants
Great Lakes Fishery Commission has published no rules for applicants.
For reviewers
- The commission's position is that reviewers cannot and should not use AI, large language models, or other generative AI technologies in the peer-review process. Reviewers are trusted to keep the work confidential and to make sure it is not shared or used outside peer review. The commission says that using AI or similar technologies violates the confidentiality process. [1]
Sources
instructions to peer reviewers (opens in a new tab)
the commission’s position is that AI, large-language models, and other generative AI technologies cannot and should not be used by reviewers in the peer-review process. Reviewers are trusted to maintain confidentiality and to ensure the reviewed work is not shared or used outside the peer-review process. Using AI or similar technologies violates the confidentiality process
See Great Lakes Fishery Commission's 2 open programs
This page summarizes what the funder has published and is not legal advice. Policies change, and one solicitation can add its own rules. Confirm against the funding announcement before you apply.