In short
Medical Research UK allows applicants to use AI tools when developing an application, where appropriate. Applicants stay responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of what they submit. The funder also expects generative AI to be used responsibly. It lists acknowledging generative AI outputs in applications as best practice.
Permits AI. Applicants may use AI and stay responsible for what they submit.
For applicants
- Applicants may choose to use AI tools to develop an application, where appropriate. They remain responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of the submission. The application should reflect the applicant's own ideas and expertise. [1]
- When developing funding proposals, researchers must use generative AI tools responsibly. Use must follow relevant legal and ethical standards, both where they exist now and as they develop. As best practice, any output from generative AI tools in a funding application should be acknowledged. [1]
For reviewers
Medical Research UK has published no rules for reviewers.
Sources
Guidance for Applicants: Changing Policy and Practice Award 2026-27 Round 2 (opens in a new tab)
Applicants may choose to use AI tools in developing their application, where appropriate. Applicants remain responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of their submission and should ensure it reflects their own ideas and expertise.
When developing funding proposals, researchers must ensure generative AI tools are used responsibly and in accordance with relevant legal and ethical standards where these exist or as they develop. As best practice, any outputs from generative AI tools in funding applications should be acknowledged.
This page summarizes what the funder has published and is not legal advice. Policies change, and one solicitation can add its own rules. Confirm against the funding announcement before you apply.