In short
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine have no single AI rule that covers all their fellowships and grants. The applicant guide for the NRC Research Associateship Programs (NRC RAP) and the Air Force Science and Technology Fellowship (AF STFP) says generative AI tools should be used to support an applicant's own voice, not replace it. Applicants who use them are expected to review and verify all AI-supported content for factual accuracy and relevance, and to avoid plagiarism and copyright infringement. The funder has published no AI guidance for Gulf Research Program applicants or for reviewers.
Varies by program. The rule is set in each program's guidelines, so check the one you are applying to.
For applicants
- NRC Research Associateship Programs and Air Force Science and Technology Fellowship: the guide says generative AI tools should be used to support an applicant's own voice, not replace it. Applicants who use these tools are expected to review and verify all AI-supported content for factual accuracy and relevance, and to avoid plagiarism and copyright infringement. The guide does not ask applicants to disclose AI use. [1]
For reviewers
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine has published no rules for reviewers.
Sources
NRC Research and Fellowship Programs Applicant Guide (opens in a new tab)
we are relying on you to review and verify all AI supported content to ensure factual accuracy, relevancy, and to avoid plagiarism and copyright infringement.
This guide provides step-by-step instructions for applicants to the NRC Research Associateship Programs (NRC RAP) and the Air Force Science and Technology Fellowship (AF STFP).
AI tools should be used to enhance rather than replace your
See National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine's 2 open programs
This page summarizes what the funder has published and is not legal advice. Policies change, and one solicitation can add its own rules. Confirm against the funding announcement before you apply.