Allowed. The funder lets applicants use AI, and applicants answer for everything they submit.
What applicants may do
What the funder asks of applicants
Rules for reviewers
- Reviewers must not use generative AI or publicly available tools such as ChatGPT, DeepL, Gemini or Copilot to evaluate grant applications. NSERC calls this strictly prohibited because uploading application information to an online tool can breach privacy and cost custody of intellectual property. [1]
- Reviewers must not penalize applicants solely for using AI. They should assess applications against the merit criteria. [1]
Where this comes from
The funder's own words, from its own pages.
Discovery Grants Peer Review Manual (sections 3.2.2 and 7.3.1) (opens in a new tab)
Applicants are permitted to use generative AI in the preparation of their DG application; however, they remain fully responsible for ensuring that all information is true, accurate and complete and that all sources are appropriately acknowledged and referenced.
Reviewers must not penalize applicants solely for using AI and should assess applications according to the merit criteria.
Therefore, the use of generative AI and publicly available tools (e.g. ChatGPT, DeepL, Gemini, Copilot, etc.) to evaluate grant applications is strictly prohibited.
Read First – CY2026 Updates (Discovery Grant Application) (opens in a new tab)
The agencies recognize that generative AI may be a valuable tool to applicants in the preparation of grant applications
The applicant is ultimately accountable for the complete contents of their application
Ensure that information included in grant applications is true, accurate and complete
See Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)'s programs
This is a reading of what the funder has published, and it is not legal advice. A solicitation can set its own rule, so read the funding announcement before a PI applies.