Depends on the program. The funder sets the rule in each program's guidelines, so check the program a PI is applying to.
What applicants may do
What the funder asks of applicants
- Applicants must clearly disclose any use of AI-generated content in the application. The page gives example wording naming the tool used. [1][2]
- Applicants must make sure all submissions are original and accurately represent their own work. The statements must be clear about the applicant's own reasons for applying for membership. [1][2]
If an applicant breaks the rule
Rules for reviewers
Phycological Society of America has published no rules for reviewers.
Where this comes from
The funder's own words, from its own pages.
Membership Information (opens in a new tab)
Generative AI tools can be used to assist in drafting application materials or improving English grammar and spelling, but applicants must ensure all submissions are original and accurately represent their own work.
Your statements must be clear about your own reasons for applying for membership.
Any use of AI-generated content must be clearly disclosed in the application.
Plagiarism or misrepresentation of AI-generated content will result in disqualification from the application process.
Membership Information (opens in a new tab)
Generative AI tools can be used to assist in drafting application materials or improving English grammar and spelling, but applicants must ensure all submissions are original and accurately represent their own work.
Any use of AI-generated content must be clearly disclosed in the application.
Plagiarism or misrepresentation of AI-generated content will result in disqualification from the application process.
See Phycological Society of America's 3 open programs
This is a reading of what the funder has published, and it is not legal advice. A solicitation can set its own rule, so read the funding announcement before a PI applies.