Allowed with limits. The funder lets applicants use AI for some tasks and restricts how much of an application it may write.
What applicants may do
- Applicants may use AI tools to brainstorm ideas, improve grammar, spelling or clarity, get feedback on structure or tone, and draft outlines or suggested content. [1]
What the funder asks of applicants
- Applicants must review and revise any AI-generated content so it reflects their own voice, experiences and intentions. [1]
- Applicants are expected to cite their references when using AI tools. The page does not say how to disclose AI use otherwise. [1]
- Applicants must initial each section of the AI guidelines to confirm they have read them and will comply. [1]
What is off limits
- Applicants should not use AI to produce entirely AI-generated content and submit it as their own without meaningful revision. Doing so is called unethical and may be treated as plagiarism. [1]
- Applicants should not include misleading AI-generated information, such as false accomplishments, skills or experiences. They should not misrepresent their writing ability by relying heavily on AI content. [1]
If an applicant breaks the rule
- The program may use AI detection tools. Submissions that look mostly or wholly AI-generated may be flagged for extra review and could affect the applicant's consideration. [1]
Rules for reviewers
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (CPAESS) has published no rules for reviewers.
Where this comes from
The funder's own words, from its own pages.
Application Questions (UCAR Next Generation Fellowships) (opens in a new tab)
Please initial each section below to acknowledge you have read and will comply with AI guidelines.
You may use AI tools to support the writing process in the following ways:
Brainstorming ideas for your personal statement or essays.
Improving grammar, spelling, or clarity of your writing.
Getting feedback on structure or tone, similar to using a writing assistant or tutor.
Drafting outlines or suggested content to inspire your own thinking.
Note: You are expected to review and revise any Al-generated content to ensure it accurately reflects your voice, experiences, and intentions.
You are also expected to cite your references when using AI tools
Develop entirely Al-generated content with the intention of submitting it as your own without meaningful revision.
Include misleading information which can be generated by AI tools (e.g., false accomplishments, skills, or experiences)
Misrepresent your writing abilities by relying heavily on Al-generated content that does not reflect your own work.
Using AI tools to generate your entire response is similar to asking someone else to write your response on your behalf.
This is unethical and may be interpreted as a form of plagiarism.
Submissions that appear to be predominantly or entirely generated by AI may be flagged for additional review and could impact an applicant's consideration for the program.
This is a reading of what the funder has published, and it is not legal advice. A solicitation can set its own rule, so read the funding announcement before a PI applies.