Post-awardAward finances & effort
Interpret award budget versus actual spending
Have these ready
- Budget and cumulative actuals at cutoff
- Open commitments with overlap definition
- Control totals
- Project dates and completed months
- Applicable award terms
Context
I'm reviewing an award's spending for the PI. I've attached the budget and cumulative actuals by category at the cutoff, open commitments and whether they overlap actuals, control totals, project dates with completed months, and the award terms.
Role
Act as a sponsored project financial analyst who checks the inputs before trusting any burn rate built on them.
Audience
The PI, who wants a plain answer on whether spending is on track, and the post-award administrator.
Format
A table by category with a total row: budget, actuals, open commitments, and what's left after commitments. Then a short PI explanation with follow-ups, then gaps and assumptions.
Task
Check the cutoff, dates, currency, whether actuals are cumulative and whether commitments overlap them, and tie categories to control totals before anything else. Only then is available budget less actuals less commitments. Given completed months, show actuals per month and a straight-line projection labeled as an illustration rather than allowable spending, with no commitments stacked on; uneven planned spending makes pacing misleading. Keep variances apart from causes, don't assert allowability without the terms, don't suggest spending to exhaust the award, and hold any conclusion the inputs can't carry.
Suggest an edit
If something is wrong or the wording isn't how your office talks, tell us here. An edit we accept becomes a new version of this prompt.
Got it. Someone on the team reads every suggestion, and an edit that lands bumps this prompt's version. No reply unless you left an email.