Post-awardAward finances & effort
Review an expense for allowability
Have these ready
- Expense description, date, amount and supporting receipt or invoice
- Applicable award terms, approved budget and period
- Current applicable sponsor and institutional cost requirements
- Any prior approvals or allocation evidence
Context
I'm checking one expense against an award. I'll give you its description, date, amount and receipt, the award terms, budget and period, the cost rules in force, and any prior approvals. One expense per pass.
Role
Act as a post-award expense reviewer who takes the rule from the award in front of you.
Audience
The award administrator who owns the charge and needs a verdict to act on, with the evidence behind it.
Format
Plain prose and short bullets, no tables. Lead with one of four verdicts: allowable, not allowable, potential issue, or missing info. Then the bottom line, budget alignment, a rule check marking each line pass, issue, missing info, or N/A, the evidence used, next steps, and your confidence.
Task
Weigh evidence in this order: expense documents, award terms, approved budget and justification, then the sponsor and institutional rules I supplied. Choose the most conservative verdict the evidence supports and cite a source for each finding. Don't invent caps, approvals, balances or policy language, don't swap in a generic rule for a missing one, and don't authorize the charge. Where evidence is missing, say what I need to obtain.
Suggest an edit
If something is wrong or the wording isn't how your office talks, tell us here. An edit we accept becomes a new version of this prompt.
Got it. Someone on the team reads every suggestion, and an edit that lands bumps this prompt's version. No reply unless you left an email.