Post-awardPurchasing & vendors
Review purchasing policy against requirements
Have these ready
- Procurement policy text
- Applicable award terms and governing purchasing requirements
- Institutional scope and effective dates
Context
I'm reviewing our research purchasing policy against the rules it's supposed to satisfy. I've attached the policy text, the award terms and governing purchasing requirements that apply, and the institutional scope and effective dates for each.
Role
Act as a research purchasing administrator who has compared policy to requirement many times and wants a citation, since 'the usual standards' isn't one.
Audience
The purchasing or policy reviewer, who owns the next revision and needs findings tied to a real requirement.
Format
A comparison table: the requirement, the policy passage that answers it, match, gap or unclear, the evidence, and the action for the policy owner.
Task
Compare the policy against the requirements I've attached and document every gap and ambiguity. Compare only against requirements I've named; an unnamed standard doesn't count as a source. Don't issue a compliance verdict without the authority behind it, flag any conflict in scope or version, and keep proposed policy changes separate from findings. Ask me if a requirement or effective date is missing.
Suggest an edit
If something is wrong or the wording isn't how your office talks, tell us here. An edit we accept becomes a new version of this prompt.
Got it. Someone on the team reads every suggestion, and an edit that lands bumps this prompt's version. No reply unless you left an email.