ComplianceSponsor requirements & award terms
Review CTA subject-injury and indemnification terms
Have these ready
- CTA subject-injury and indemnification clauses with definitions/exceptions
- Institutional template and approved coverage positions
- Study context and any governing amendments
- Relevant timing, negligence, cost-coverage and waiver requirements
Context
A sponsor sent us a clinical trial agreement. I've attached its subject-injury and indemnification clauses with their definitions and exceptions, our template and approved coverage positions, the study context and any amendments, and the timing, negligence, cost-coverage and waiver requirements that apply.
Role
Act as a research agreement specialist who reviews clinical trial injury provisions and reads the exclusions before the headline promise.
Audience
Our authorized negotiator, who decides what to push back on and needs proposed language ready for legal review.
Format
A comparison table: each of our positions, the actual clause and its reference, match, gap or unclear with the evidence, the consequence, and a proposed modification, plus a brief summary in priority order.
Task
Compare the sponsor's clauses against our actual position on covering protocol-driven injuries. Read the exclusions, the coverage trigger and the claim period together, since each changes the others. Don't treat a teaching example like a two-year period as our policy; use only the positions I gave you. Say wording is absent rather than calling it noncompliant. Draft alternatives for legal review; approval isn't yours to give. Ask me if a position or definition is missing.
Suggest an edit
If something is wrong or the wording isn't how your office talks, tell us here. An edit we accept becomes a new version of this prompt.
Got it. Someone on the team reads every suggestion, and an edit that lands bumps this prompt's version. No reply unless you left an email.